Reference List (Continuation)

McFarquhar, G. M., and R. List, 1993: The effect of curve fits for the disdrometer calibration on raindrop spectra, rainfall rate, and radar reflectivity.
J. Appl. Meteor., 32, 774-782.

McFarquhar, G. M., R. List, D. R. Hudak, R. P. Nissen, and J. S. Dobbie, 1996: Flux measurements of pulsating rain with a disdrometer and Doppler radar during phase II of the joint tropical rain experiment in Malaysia.
J. Appl. Meteor., 35, 859-874.

McKague, D., K. F. Evans, and Susan Avery, 1998: Assessment of the effects of drop size distribution variations retrieved from UHV radar on passive microwave remote sensing of precipitation.
J. Appl. Meteor., 37, 155-165.

Nystuen, J. A., J. R. Proni, P. G. Black, and J. C. Wilkerson, 1996: A comparison of automatic rain gauges.
J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 13, 62-73.

Nystuen, J. A., 1996: Acoustical rainfall analysis: Rainfall drop size distribution usingthe underwater sound field.
J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 13, 74-84.

Rosewell, C. J., 1986: Rainfall kinetic energy in Eastern Australia.
J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25, 1695-1701.

Sauvageot, H., and J. P. Lacaux, 1995: The shape of averaged drop size distributions.
J. Atmos. Sci., 52, 1070-1083.

Sauvageot, H., and M. Koffi, 2000: Multimodal raindrop size distributions.
J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 2480 - 2492.

B. K. Seela, J. Janapati, P-L. Lin, P.K. Wang and M-T. Lee, 2018: Raindrop Size Distribution Characteristics of Summer and Winter Season Rainfall over North Taiwan
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 123, 10.1029/2018JD028307

B. K. Seela, J. Janapati, P-L. Lin, K. K. Reddy, R. Shirooka and P. K. Wang, 2017: A Comparison Study of Summer Season Raindrop Size Distribution between Palau and Taiwan, Two Islands in Western Pacific
‚ÄčJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, Vol. 122, 10.1002/2017JD026816

Seliga, T. A., K. Aydin and H. Direskeneli, 1986: Disdrometer measurements during an intense rainfall event in Central Illinois: Implications for differential reflectivity radar observations.

J. Climate Appl. Meteor., 25, 835-846.

Sheppard, B. E., 1990: Effect of irregularities in the diameter classification of raindrops by the Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer.
J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 7, 180-183.

Sheppard, B. E., and P. I. Joe, 1994: Comparison of raindrop size distribution measurements by a Joss-Waldvogel disdrometer, a PMS 2DG spectrometer, and a POSS Doppler radar.
J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 11, 874-887.

Steiner, M., and A. Waldvogel, 1987: Peaks in raindrop size distributions.
J. Atmos. Sci., 44, 3127-3133.

Thomson, A. D., and R. List, 1996: Raindrop spectra and updraft determination by combining Doppler radar and disdrometer.
J. Atmos. Ocea. Tech., 13, 465-476.

Tokay, A., and D. A. Short, 1996: Evidence from tropical raindrop spectra of the origin of rain from stratiform versus convective clouds.
J. Appl. Meteor., 35, 355-371.

Tokay, A., and K. V. Beard, 1996: A field study of raindrop oscillations. Part I: Observation of size spectra and evaluation of oscillation causes.
J. Appl. Meteor., 35, 1671-1687.

Tokay, A.; Kruger, A. and Krajewski, W. F., 2001: Comparison of drop size distribution measurements by impact and optical disdrometers.
J. Appl. Meteor., 40,  2083 - 2097

Waldvogel, A., 1974: The No jump of raindrop spectra.
J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 1067-1078.

Yuter, S. E., and R. A. Houze Jr., 1997: Measurements of raindrop size distributions over the Pacific warm pool and implications for Z-R relations.
J. Appl. Meteor., 36, 847 - 867.

Zawadzki, I., and M. de Agostinho Antonio, 1988: Equilibrium raindrop size distributions in tropical rain.
J. Atmos. Sci., 45, 3452-3459.

last update: 2019

Printer Friendly Page



 

quotes
blockHeaderEditIcon

Quotes

...The JWD is one of the most widely used instruments around the globe for analyzing the RSD and rain characteristics...

…This clearly suggests that the rain integral parameters derived from the JWD can be utilized to understand the summer and winter rainfall RSD characteristics...

...The JWD is a reliable instrument that operates continuously and unattended...

...Despite advances in disdrometer technology in the 1980s, the JWD is still considered to be the standard for DSD measurements at the ground surface...

Username:
User Login
Your Email
*